There are already too many points to ponder over what used to be the simple (and at one time in the distant past even pleasurable) act of shopping for produce in a grocery store. Paper or plastic, organic or conventional, GM or natural and the list goes on. Each choice is fraught with ambiguity because there is no black and white answer to the question of right or wrong - for who and what goes in to producing that food or for those who will consume it.
To add to our angst-ridden produce shopping experience is this new idea of calling out in the how far the food has traveled. Is the consumer now expected to add the miles and use that total to feed their guilt about hurting the planet. Or they may have a way to pay their way out of it by shopping only stuff that was grown with a hundred mile radius.
crossings as in traversals, contradictions, counterpoints of the heart though often not..
Subscribe to my Substack: Signals in the Noise
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Seeing Slow
The arguments in this HBR article are similar to what other like the author who work in large enterprises are saying about the impact of AI...
-
An expat desi friend and I were discussing what it means to return to India when you have cobbled together a life in a foreign country no ma...
-
Recently a desi dude who is more acquaintance less friend called to check in on me. Those who have read this blog before might know that suc...
-
I, Ananya, am a suburban single mother minus the SUV that often comes with the territory. Ten years ago, I would have been awed by someone i...
3 comments:
Add to it the 'happy meat' concept. Wonder what's next.
Liked this post, added to my Top 3 reccos on my blog for other readers to read this as well.
Uma - As opposed to sad meat I guess. They will do anything to tug at the consumer's heartstrings
Swapna - Thanks for stopping by. Glad to liked the post.
Post a Comment