Finished read The Splendid and The Vile after many fits and starts. Was also reading The Anarchy in parallel - not related to the WW2 but useful in understanding the East India Company and therefore British colonization of India. Somewhere along the way found this essay that offers a point of view on the WW2 that is not the lens that Erik Larson uses in his book. Reading snippets of history that tackle small perspectives at a time is a lot like the parable of the elephant and the blind men - the only thing I learned is that the topic is vast and complex and just to understand the all points of view could take a life-time and yet provide no resolution.
The key protagonists are complex and multi-dimensional. The unambiguous villains are the easiest ones to classify but the "heroes" can invoke a fantastic range of response depending on who is telling the story. Larson shows Churchill as a hero in his book and given the plot points he covers, there is some logic to that. Others have called him a war criminal and they have their reasons too. I have a few more books lined up to read on WW2 and am sure that will only serve to open my eyes to the many other perspectives on what happened and why.
Comments