Recently, I was invited along with a few others to interview a data scientist. The candidate was going to present one of his past projects so we got a sense of his skills and experience. Generally, all good ideas except one thing. The candidate was more qualified and credentialed than all of us put together. If I was in his shoes, I may have felt insulted that such a motley crew was going to make a determination about my abilities. While its nice and magnanimous of this person to submit to such unqualified scrutiny, it made me wonder what if any assessment we could possibly make regarding his fitness for purpose.
This incident also made me think about the state of data science and its disconnect from the lay people whose problems and questions it is supposed to answer. Once the mechanics of how the data is used to arrive at the answer becomes so complex that the person asking the question has no way of validating the approach from a commonsense perspective, the solution is some kind of black magic they need to trust, Furthermore, they need to assume their problem statement was correctly understood, interpreted and translated into the data science space from plain English. They have no assurances that any of that is true.
crossings as in traversals, contradictions, counterpoints of the heart though often not..
Subscribe to my Substack: Signals in the Noise
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Greed Price
In this article, “ How McKinsey Destroyed the Middle Class ,” the author, argues that management consulting, led by firms like McKinsey, has...
-
An expat desi friend and I were discussing what it means to return to India when you have cobbled together a life in a foreign country no ma...
-
Recently a desi dude who is more acquaintance less friend called to check in on me. Those who have read this blog before might know that suc...
-
Published in Serenelight Shiv is fond of saying that he is left where magic realism meets Haiku and remembers having mentioned this to Joie...
No comments:
Post a Comment