Have to wonder if 120 is a great sample size for a country the size of Germany for this universal income experiment. Sounds like the number was driven by the number of donors who signed up to help fund the experiment. There does not appear to be any other basis for this arbitrary and very small sample set. According to the article;
Finland experimented with a form of basic income for nearly two years: From January 2017 to December 2018, 2,000 unemployed Finns received €560 a month. But the researchers behind that trial concluded that while it led to people out of work feeling happier, it did not lead to increased employment, the BBC reported.
If the idea is to get past the stereotypes associated with those in favor and those opposed to universal income, an experiment involving a test population of 120 is very unlikely to move the needle. The findings when published will just be an intellectual diversion un-tethered to reality where both sides of the debate can find enough content to stay latched to their current perspectives
Comments